Usage & Billing
Monitor your credit consumption and enrichment success metrics across all platform activities.
Accessing Usage
Section titled “Accessing Usage”Navigate to Usage from the bottom section of the left navigation.
Interface
Section titled “Interface”Date Range Picker: Top-right on both tabs — Select the time period to analyze
Tabs:
- Credits — Consumption and transaction history
- Enrichment — Success metrics by enrichment type
Credits Tab
Section titled “Credits Tab”Track all credit consumption across the platform.
Top Summary
Section titled “Top Summary”Total Credits Usage: Sum of all credits consumed in selected date range
Example: “12,450 credits” for last 30 days
Category Buckets:
Usage breakdown with transaction counts:
| Category | Description | Typical Use |
|---|---|---|
| Data Firewall | Hygiene and validation pipelines | Data cleaning, quality assessment |
| Enrichment | Contact and company enrichment | LinkedIn profiles, email discovery |
| Sequence | Outreach generation | Email sequence generation |
| Visitor ID | Anonymous visitor identification | Website visitor tracking |
| AI Assistant | RevOps Assistant usage | Chat conversations, configurations |
Each bucket shows:
- Total credits consumed
- Number of transactions
- Percentage of total usage
Example:
Data Firewall: 5,200 credits (42%)└─ 5,200 transactions
Enrichment: 4,800 credits (39%)└─ 2,400 transactions
Sequence: 2,100 credits (17%)└─ 300 transactions
Visitor ID: 250 credits (2%)└─ 125 transactions
AI Assistant: 100 credits (1%)└─ 50 transactionsTransactions Table
Section titled “Transactions Table”Detailed transaction history:
Columns:
| Column | Description |
|---|---|
| Occurred At | Timestamp of transaction |
| Category | Feature group (Data Firewall, Enrichment, etc.) |
| Type | Debit (consumed) or Credit (refunded) |
| Amount | Credits consumed or credited |
| Actions | Details button for metadata |
Table Features:
- Sortable columns
- Searchable (filter by category, type)
- Paginated results
Details Button:
Click to see per-entry metadata:
- Pipeline name
- Record ID (contact/company)
- Processing status
- Timestamp
- User who triggered (if manual)
- Additional context
Pagination:
- Bottom-right navigation
- Page size selector bottom-left
- Options: 25, 50, 100, 200 per page
Common Operations
Section titled “Common Operations”Filter by Date:
Isolate campaign windows or specific time periods:
- Click date range picker
- Select start and end dates
- Or choose preset: Last 7 days, Last 30 days, Last 90 days
- View updated totals
Sort by Category:
Identify which features consume most credits:
- Click “Category” column header
- View grouped transactions
- Compare category totals
Sort by Amount:
Find heavy usage patterns:
- Click “Amount” column header
- Largest transactions appear first
- Investigate high-cost operations
Export Data:
For accounting or analysis:
- Select date range
- Click export button (if available)
- Download CSV with all transactions
Enrichment Tab
Section titled “Enrichment Tab”Roll-up success metrics by enrichment type for selected date range.
Metric Cards
Section titled “Metric Cards”Each enrichment type shows three key metrics:
Attempts: Total enrichment runs attempted
Success Rate: Successful / Attempts percentage
Successful Enrichments: Absolute count of successes
Typical Cards
Section titled “Typical Cards”Company LinkedIn Enrichment:
Attempts: 1,250Success Rate: 82%Successful: 1,025Contact LinkedIn Enrichment:
Attempts: 2,100Success Rate: 68%Successful: 1,428Company Revenue Enrichment:
Attempts: 1,250Success Rate: 75%Successful: 937Email Discovery:
Attempts: 500Success Rate: 45%Successful: 225Interpretation
Section titled “Interpretation”Healthy Metrics:
| Enrichment Type | Good Success Rate |
|---|---|
| Company LinkedIn | 70-90% |
| Contact LinkedIn | 60-80% |
| Email Discovery | 40-60% |
| Revenue Data | 65-85% |
High Attempts, Low Success:
Usually indicates:
- Source misconfiguration
- Under-specified inputs (missing required fields)
- Invalid/test data in source
- Wrong data associations
Example:
Contact LinkedIn EnrichmentAttempts: 5,000Success Rate: 15%Successful: 750Problem: Too many failures
Solutions:
- Check contacts have first name, last name
- Verify company associations exist
- Run quality assessment pipelines from Marketplace first
- Review data source mappings
Low Success Rate:
May indicate:
- Integration issues
- Provider API problems
- Data quality problems
- Incorrect field mappings
Success Rate Trends:
Compare across types to identify best performers:
- High success = good data quality
- Low success = investigate immediately
- Declining trends = deteriorating data or config issues
Usage Tips
Section titled “Usage Tips”1. Set Date Ranges Strategically
Section titled “1. Set Date Ranges Strategically”Week-over-Week:
This week vs last weekTrack weekly usage patterns
Month-over-Month:
This month vs last monthMonitor monthly trends
Campaign Windows:
Campaign launch date to end dateMeasure campaign-specific costs
2. Monitor Category Distribution
Section titled “2. Monitor Category Distribution”Ensure spending aligns with priorities:
Example Analysis:
Data Firewall: 60% (priority: high)Enrichment: 35% (priority: medium)AI Assistant: 5% (priority: low)Spending matches priorities ✅
Misaligned Example:
Visitor ID: 70%Data Firewall: 20%Enrichment: 10%Action: Reduce Visitor ID usage, increase core operations
3. Check Enrichment Success Rates
Section titled “3. Check Enrichment Success Rates”Weekly: Review Enrichment tab for issues
Red flags:
- Success rate < 30% (investigate immediately)
- Sudden drops in success (API issues?)
- High attempts with flat success (config problem)
Green flags:
- Success rate > 60%
- Consistent performance
- Gradual improvements
4. Review Transaction Details
Section titled “4. Review Transaction Details”For High-Cost Items:
- Sort by Amount (descending)
- Click Details on largest transactions
- Verify legitimate usage
- Identify optimization opportunities
For Unexpected Charges:
- Filter by date range
- Review transaction details
- Check pipeline configurations
- Contact support if needed
5. Track AI Assistant Usage
Section titled “5. Track AI Assistant Usage”Monitor:
- Conversation count
- Credit consumption
- Feature usage patterns
Beta considerations:
- Usage patterns may change
- Pricing may be adjusted
- Provide feedback on costs
Cost Optimization
Section titled “Cost Optimization”Identify Expensive Operations
Section titled “Identify Expensive Operations”High-Cost Operations:
- Agent pipelines for complex analysis
- Standard enrichment services
- Research-intensive operations
Optimization:
- Run Classifier pipelines before expensive operations
- Filter for high-quality records only
- Save significantly on invalid/low-quality data
Set Processing Limits
Section titled “Set Processing Limits”In pipeline Settings:
- Daily limits prevent runaway costs
- Rate limits control speed
- Volume caps enforce budgets
Example:
Agent pipeline:- Max 100 records/day- Cost: 100 records × cost per record- Monthly budget calculated from daily limitTarget High-Value Segments
Section titled “Target High-Value Segments”Instead of enriching all records:
Before:
All contacts: 50,000Cost: 50,000 × $2 = $100,000After (targeted):
Active opportunities: 2,500Cost: 2,500 × $2 = $5,000Savings: $95,000Use Low-Cost Pipelines First
Section titled “Use Low-Cost Pipelines First”Workflow:
- Code pipelines (Free/low-cost)
- Classifier pipelines (Low-moderate cost)
- Filter for quality
- Agent pipelines on valid records only
- Enrichment services on cleaned data
Result: Only pay for quality data
Troubleshooting
Section titled “Troubleshooting”Unexpected High Usage
Section titled “Unexpected High Usage”Issue: Credits consumed faster than expected
Check:
- Processing limits — Are they set too high?
- Auto-enroll — Is pipeline automatically enrolling too many records?
- List sizes — Are source lists larger than expected?
- Review policy — Is auto-confirm enrolling invalid records?
Solutions:
- Reduce daily limits
- Use smaller, targeted lists
- Enable human review
- Filter with cheaper pipelines first
Zero Usage Showing
Section titled “Zero Usage Showing”Issue: No usage appears in dashboard
Possible causes:
- No pipelines running
- Date range selected has no activity
- Pipelines in Draft status (not Active)
Solutions:
- Check date range
- Verify pipelines are Active
- Check pipeline Overview tabs for processing
- Ensure lists have records
Success Rates Declining
Section titled “Success Rates Declining”Issue: Enrichment success rates dropping over time
Investigate:
- Data quality deteriorating?
- Provider API changes?
- Field mappings broken?
- Integration issues?
Solutions:
- Review data quality
- Run hygiene pipelines
- Check field mappings
- Test with known-good records
Next Steps
Section titled “Next Steps”- Configure Processing Limits — Control costs
- Data Deduplication — Optimize data quality
- Enrichment Best Practices — Reduce enrichment costs