Sequences Best Practices
Best practices for creating high-quality, effective outreach sequences in Sequence Studio.
Content Quality
Section titled “Content Quality”Truth-Only Policy
Section titled “Truth-Only Policy”Every sentence must be verifiably true.
Implementation:
- ✅ “Our platform integrates with HubSpot” (if it does)
- ❌ “You’ll love our platform” (subjective, unverifiable)
- ✅ “We work with 500+ B2B companies” (if true)
- ❌ “You’re probably looking for a solution like ours” (assumption)
Benefits:
- Builds trust
- Reduces legal risk
- Improves brand reputation
- Higher response quality
Evidence Hierarchy
Section titled “Evidence Hierarchy”Prioritize data sources:
1. Ground Facts (highest trust)
- Provided in prompt explicitly
- From verified data sources
- Company-approved messaging
2. Derived Facts (medium trust)
- Calculated from ground facts
- Logical inferences with evidence
- Industry-standard assumptions
3. Metadata (context only)
- LinkedIn activity hints
- Behavioral signals
- Industry trends
Never use:
- Speculation without evidence
- Assumptions about individual needs
- Fabricated details
Omit When Missing
Section titled “Omit When Missing”Philosophy: Prefer omission to invention.
Examples:
Good:
"I noticed you recently joined [Company]."// Only if employment data is fresh and verifiedBetter:
"As [Job Title] at [Company]..."// Uses confirmed data, doesn't make assumptions about timelineBest:
"[Company] recently raised Series B funding."// Only mention if this data exists in sourcesInstead of guessing:
❌ "You're probably interested in improving your sales process"✅ Omit entirely if no evidence of pain pointPersonalization
Section titled “Personalization”Invisible Personalization
Section titled “Invisible Personalization”Make personalization feel serendipitous, not obvious.
Bad (Obvious):
"I saw your recent post about AI in sales...""Based on your profile, I think...""Considering your background in marketing..."Good (Invisible):
Uses LinkedIn activity to inform tone,but doesn't explicitly reference it.
Mentions industry trends relevant to their sector,without saying "I researched your industry."Benefits:
- Feels more genuine
- Less “salesy”
- Higher response rates
- Better relationship building
Data-Driven Context
Section titled “Data-Driven Context”Use enrichment data as background context:
Available Data:
- LinkedIn recent activity
- Company news
- Funding events
- Job changes
How to Use:
- Inform message tone
- Guide value prop selection
- Influence examples used
- Shape call-to-action
How NOT to Use:
- Don’t quote their posts
- Don’t reference specific activities
- Don’t mention you “researched” them
Generic When Appropriate
Section titled “Generic When Appropriate”Philosophy: Generic is better than fake personalized.
When to be generic:
- Insufficient data for authentic personalization
- Risk of assumptions being wrong
- Data quality questionable
- High-volume campaigns
Examples:
Generic (Good):
"As a [Job Title] at a [Size] [Industry] company,you might be interested in..."Fake Personalized (Bad):
"Based on your interest in AI..." // No evidence of interest"You're probably facing challenges with..." // Pure assumptionTone & Style
Section titled “Tone & Style”Casual-Professional
Section titled “Casual-Professional”Balance professionalism with approachability:
Too Formal:
"Dear Mr. Smith,
I hope this correspondence finds you well. I am writing to..."Too Casual:
"Hey!
OMG our product is amazing and you NEED to check it out!"Just Right:
"Hi Sarah,
Quick note about [specific value prop].
[Brief context]
[Single CTA]
Best,John"Length Guidelines
Section titled “Length Guidelines”Email length: 30-80 words ideal
Why short works:
- Busy prospects scan
- Mobile-friendly
- Focuses message
- Increases read rate
Structure:
1-2 sentences: Context/Hook1-2 sentences: Value proposition1 sentence: Call to action
Total: 4-5 sentences maximumSingle CTA
Section titled “Single CTA”One call-to-action per email:
Good:
"Would 15 minutes next week work to discuss?"Bad:
"Would you like a demo? Or we could schedule a call?Or I could send you a case study? Let me know what works!"Why single CTA:
- Reduces decision fatigue
- Clearer ask
- Higher conversion
- Easier to track
Technical Guidelines
Section titled “Technical Guidelines”No Links Policy
Section titled “No Links Policy”Recommendation: No links in cold emails
Reasons:
- Spam filters
- Looks less sales-y
- Forces response to engage
- Better deliverability
Exceptions:
- Follow-ups after response
- Post-meeting follow-up
- Requested materials
Instead of links:
❌ "Check out our website: [link]"❌ "Book time here: [calendar link]"
✅ "Happy to send our case study if helpful"✅ "Would next Tuesday work for a quick call?"HTML Formatting
Section titled “HTML Formatting”Use:
- Paragraphs (
<p>) - Line breaks (
<br>) - Basic formatting
Avoid:
- Images
- Complex layouts
- Colored text
- Fancy fonts
- Tables
Why:
- Better deliverability
- Looks like personal email
- Mobile-friendly
- Accessible
Subject Lines
Section titled “Subject Lines”Best practices:
Sentence case:
✅ "Quick question about TechCorp"❌ "QUICK QUESTION ABOUT TECHCORP"❌ "Quick Question About TechCorp"Length: 30-50 characters
Avoid:
- “RE:” or “FW:” tricks
- Excessive punctuation!!!
- ALL CAPS
- Misleading subjects
Effective patterns:
"[Mutual connection] suggested I reach out""Quick question about [specific pain point]""Thoughts on [relevant industry trend]""[Their company] + [Your company]"Data Sources
Section titled “Data Sources”Be Selective
Section titled “Be Selective”Don’t enable all sources by default.
Always Enable:
- HubSpot Contact (baseline data)
- HubSpot Company (company context)
- Previous Communication (avoid duplicates)
Selectively Enable:
- LinkedIn Profile (if personalization needed)
- Company News (for timely relevance)
- Deals (for account context)
Rarely Enable:
- LinkedIn Posts (expensive, often unhelpful)
- Company Posts (adds noise)
- Financing Events (niche use case)
Cost vs. Value
Section titled “Cost vs. Value”High Value, Low Cost:
- ✅ Contact baseline data
- ✅ Previous communication
- ✅ Company basics
High Value, High Cost:
- ⚠️ LinkedIn profile (use selectively)
- ⚠️ Company news (recent only)
Low Value, High Cost:
- ❌ LinkedIn posts (rarely useful)
- ❌ Website summary (generic)
Testing Strategy
Section titled “Testing Strategy”Sample Size
Section titled “Sample Size”Initial test: 10-20 contacts
Review:
- Read every generated email
- Check facts
- Verify personalization
- Assess tone
If good: Expand to 50-100
If issues: Fix and re-test with 10-20
What to Test
Section titled “What to Test”Content Quality:
- All facts verifiable?
- Personalization appropriate?
- Tone consistent?
- Length appropriate?
Technical:
- Links working? (if any)
- Formatting correct?
- Subject lines compelling?
- Sender info correct?
Compliance:
- No false claims?
- CAN-SPAM compliant?
- GDPR/privacy respected?
- Brand guidelines followed?
A/B Testing
Section titled “A/B Testing”Test one variable at a time:
Good tests:
- Subject line A vs B
- Opening line variation
- CTA wording
- Email length
Bad tests:
- Changing everything at once
- Too many variables
- Insufficient sample size
Minimum sample: 100 contacts per variation
Performance Optimization
Section titled “Performance Optimization”Reply Rate Benchmarks
Section titled “Reply Rate Benchmarks”Cold email benchmarks:
- 1-3% reply rate = Good
- 3-5% reply rate = Excellent
-
5% reply rate = Outstanding
If below 1%:
- Review messaging relevance
- Check target audience fit
- Verify deliverability
- Test different value props
Improving Response Rates
Section titled “Improving Response Rates”Tactics:
Better Targeting:
- Tighter audience definition
- More relevant value props
- Stronger pain point alignment
Content Optimization:
- Shorter emails
- Clearer value prop
- Stronger CTA
- Better subject lines
Timing:
- Test send times
- Avoid weekends
- Consider time zones
- Space out touches
Deliverability
Section titled “Deliverability”Maintain good sender reputation:
Do:
- ✅ Warm up email domain
- ✅ Authenticate (SPF, DKIM, DMARC)
- ✅ Monitor bounce rates
- ✅ Clean lists regularly
Don’t:
- ❌ Send to invalid emails
- ❌ Use spam trigger words
- ❌ Send too high volume initially
- ❌ Ignore unsubscribes
Common Mistakes
Section titled “Common Mistakes”Over-Personalization
Section titled “Over-Personalization”Problem: Mentioning too much research
Example:
"I saw your post about AI on January 15th at 3pm,and noticed you've worked at 3 previous companies,and your LinkedIn shows you're interested in..."Fix: Use data to inform, not to show off research
False Assumptions
Section titled “False Assumptions”Problem: Guessing about prospects
Example:
"You're probably struggling with [problem]""I imagine you're looking for [solution]""You must be frustrated with [situation]"Fix: Either verify assumptions or omit them
Generic Templates
Section titled “Generic Templates”Problem: Obviously mass-sent
Example:
"Dear [First Name],
I help companies like [Company Name] with [Generic Problem]..."Fix: Write for a specific persona, not a template
Too Much Product
Section titled “Too Much Product”Problem: Feature dump
Example:
"Our platform has:- Feature 1- Feature 2- Feature 3- Feature 4- Feature 5
Want a demo?"Fix: One value prop, one CTA
Compliance
Section titled “Compliance”Legal Requirements
Section titled “Legal Requirements”CAN-SPAM (US):
- ✅ Accurate sender info
- ✅ Clear unsubscribe
- ✅ Honor opt-outs within 10 days
- ✅ Physical address included
GDPR (EU):
- ✅ Legitimate interest documented
- ✅ Easy opt-out
- ✅ Data processing disclosed
- ✅ Privacy policy available
CASL (Canada):
- ✅ Implied or express consent
- ✅ Clear sender identification
- ✅ Unsubscribe mechanism
Brand Guidelines
Section titled “Brand Guidelines”Follow company standards:
- Approved messaging
- Brand voice
- Legal disclaimers
- Trademark usage
Review with:
- Legal team
- Marketing team
- Compliance team
- Leadership
Next Steps
Section titled “Next Steps”- Creating Sequences — Complete Studio workflow guide
- Sequence Studio Overview — Learn about Studio features
- HubSpot Integration — CRM setup